Home
Life, Liberty, Property
Less Serious
History
Links
|
Walter E. Williams:
"What's “just” has been debated for
centuries but let me offer you my definition of social justice: I keep
what I earn and you keep what you earn. Do you disagree? Well then tell
me how much of what I earn “belongs” to you -- and why?"
"Conservatives and liberals are kindred
spirits as far as government spending is concerned. First, let's make
sure we understand what government spending is. Since government has no
resources of its own, and since there's no Tooth Fairy handing Congress
the funds for the programs it enacts, we are forced to recognize that
government spending is no less than the confiscation of one person's
property to give it to another to whom it does not belong -- in effect,
legalized theft.
"Liberals believe government should take
people's earnings to give to poor people. Conservatives disagree. They
think government should confiscate people's earnings and give them to
farmers and insolvent banks. The compelling issue to both conservatives
and liberals is not whether it is legitimate for government to
confiscate one's property to give to another, the debate is over the
disposition of the pillage."
Thomas Sowell:
"Freedom...refer[s] to a social
relationship among people -- namely, the absence of force as a
prospective instrument of decision making. Freedom is reduced whenever a
decision is made under threat of force, whether or not force actually
materializes or is evident in retrospect."
"No matter how disastrously some policy has
turned out, anyone who criticizes it can expect to hear: 'But what would
you replace it with?' When you put out a fire, what do you replace it
with?"
"What is history but the story of how
politicians have squandered the blood and treasure of the human race."
"Much of the social history of the Western
world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what
has worked with what sounded good. In area after area -- crime,
education, housing, race relations -- the situation has gotten worse
after the bright new theories were put into operation. The amazing thing
is that this history of failure and disaster has neither discouraged the
social engineers nor discredited them."
"What is ominous is the ease with which
some people go from saying that they don't like something to saying that
the government should forbid it. When you go down that road, don't
expect freedom to survive very long."
"The assumption that spending more of the
taxpayer's money will make things better has survived all kinds of
evidence that it has made things worse. The black family -- which
survived slavery, discrimination, poverty, wars and depressions -- began
to come apart as the federal government moved in with its well-financed
programs to 'help.'"
"It is precisely those things which belong
to 'the people' which have historically been despoiled -- wild
creatures, the air, and waterways being notable examples. This goes to
the heart of why property rights are socially important in the first
place. Property rights mean self-interested monitors. No owned creatures
are in danger of extinction. No owned forests are in danger of being
leveled. No one kills the goose that lays the golden egg when it is his
goose."
"What is politically defined as economic
'planning' is the forcible superseding of other people's plans by
government officials.”
"Socialism in
general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual
could ignore or evade it."
P.J.
O'Rourke:
One of the annoying things about believing
in free will and individual responsibility is the difficulty of finding
somebody to blame your problems on. And when you do find somebody, it's
remarkable how often his picture turns up on your driver's license.
"Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car
keys to teenage boys."
Advocating the expansion of the powers of
the state is treason to mankind.
That liberals aren't enamored of real
freedom may have something to do with responsibility - that cumbersome
backpack which all free men have to lug on life's aerobic nature hike.
The second item in the liberal creed, after self-righteousness, is
unaccountability. Liberals have invented whole college majors -
psychology, sociology, women's studies - to prove that nothing is
anybody's fault.
Freedom is not empowerment. Empowerment is what the Serbs have in
Bosnia. Anybody can grab a gun and be empowered. It's not entitlement.
An entitlement is what people on welfare get, and how free are they?
It's not an endlessly expanding list of rights -- the `right' to
education, the `'right' to health care, the `right' to food and housing.
That's not freedom, that's dependency. Those aren't rights, those are
the rations of slavery -- hay and a barn for human cattle. There's only
one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with
it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences.
The Second Amendment states that "the right of the people to keep and
bear arms, shall not be infringed", period. There is no mention of
magazine sizes, the rate of fire or to what extend these arms may
resemble assault rifles. All rifles were assault rifles in those days.
The principle feature of American liberalism is sanctimoniousness. By
loudly denouncing all bad things-war and hunger and date rape-liberals
testify to their own terrific goodness. More important, they promote
themselves to membership in a self-selecting elite of those who care
deeply about such things...It's a kind of natural aristocracy, and the
wonderful thing about this aristocracy is that you don't have to be
brave, smart, strong or even lucky to join it, you just have to be
liberal.
There are twenty-seven specific complaints against the British Crown set
forth in the Declaration of Independence. To modern ears they still
sound reasonable...in large part, because so many of them can be leveled
against the federal government of the United States.
Seriousness is stupidity sent to college.
There's something about Marxism that brings out warts-the only kind of
growth this economic system encourages.
...remember that all tax revenue is the result of holding a gun to
somebody's head.
Whatever it is that the government does, sensible Americans would prefer
that the government do it to somebody else. This is the idea behind
foreign policy.
No drug, not even alcohol, causes the fundamental ills of society. If
we're looking for the sources of our troubles, we shouldn't test people
for drugs, we should test them for stupidity, ignorance, greed and love
of power.
For the people in government, rather than the people who pester it,
Washington is an early-rising, hard-working city. It is a popular
delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through
inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are
required to waste this much money.
The federal government of the United States of America takes away
between a fifth and a quarter of all our money every year. That is eight
times the Islamic zakat, the almsgiving required of believers by the
Koran; it is double the tithe of the medieval church and twice the royal
tribute that the prophet Samuel warned the Israelites against when they
wanted him to anoint a ruler...
So when can we quit passing laws and raising taxes? When can we say of
our political system, "Stick a fork in it, it's done"? When will our
officers, officials and magistrates realize that their jobs are finished
and return, like Cincinnatus, to the plow or, as it were, to the law
practice or the car dealership? The mystery of government is not how
Washington works but how to make it stop.
[Pete] DuPont said that farmers should go pound sand with the rest of
us. When somebody's muffler shop goes bankrupt, the government doesn't
pay him $100,000 to not install mufflers.
Many reporters, when they go to work in the nation's capital, begin to
think of themselves as participants in the political process instead of
glorified stenographers. Washington journalists are seduced by their
proximity to power...
Term limits aren't enough. We need jail
On the original Earth Day in 1970 -- when the world was going to end
from overcrowding instead of overheating--the best-selling author of
/The Population Bomb/, Dr. Paul Ehrlich...predicted that America would
have water rationing by 1974 and food rationing by 1980, that hepatitis
and dysentery rates in the U.S. would increase by 500 percent due to
population density and that the oceans could be as dead as Lake Erie by
1979.
James Madison:
"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and
are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may take
the care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in
every State, county and parish and pay them out of their public
treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children,
establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may
assume the provision of the poor; they may undertake the regulation of
all roads other than post-roads; in short, every thing, from the highest
object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police,
would be thrown under the power of Congress. ... Were the power of
Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would
subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the
limited Government established by the people of America. "
-- James Madison 1789
|